Bridging the Literacy Gap in our Secondary Schools

Home

3 February, 2026 —

Blog

Bridging the Literacy Gap in our Secondary Schools

A Blueprint for Evidence-Informed Change in the North East

Share on:

by Newcastle Research School
on the 3rd February 2026

Vicky Gardiner-Earl

Deputy Director: Newcastle Research School

Vicky is the Deputy Director of Newcastle Research School. She has over 20 years of experience as a teacher of English in a range of Secondary schools and has worked as both a Middle and Senior Leader.

Prior to taking up her current role, Vicky has led on Teaching and Learning and Professional Development across a large Multi Academy Trust.

In the North East, literacy is more than a curriculum requirement; it is a vehicle for social mobility. From the hidden rural poverty in Northumberland villages to the post-industrial coastal towns like Redcar, the “literacy gap” is often the visible edge of the disadvantage gap which currently stands at 20.9 months in the North East.

However, as we often discuss at Newcastle Research School, knowing “what works” is only half the battle. The real challenge lies in implementation. How do we move from reading an EEF Guidance Report to seeing a measurable impact on a student’s ability to decode a complex scientific text or write a persuasive historical essay?

The answer lies in the bridge between two pillars of evidence: the EEF Literacy Guidance Reports and the Effective Professional Development (PD) Guidance Report.

The What

Prioritising Disciplinary Literacy

To close the gap, we must move beyond the idea that literacy is the sole responsibility of the English department. The EEF’s Improving Literacy in Secondary Schools report places Disciplinary Literacy at its heart (Recommendation 1).

The disciplinary literacy tree can be used to define and exemplify disciplinary literacy for school leaders and curriculum leads delivering training, or more generally by classroom teachers interested in exploring the nuanced ways in which their subject, and others, communicate.

Dis Lit Tree — The EEF's Disciplinary Literacy Tree

In a North East context, where “cultural capital” is cited as a challenge by 18% of North East Schools’ in a large sample of Pupil Premium Strategies, our literacy strategies must be intentional and support the holistic development of our pupils. A student shouldn’t just be “reading” in school; they should be learning to read like a scientist, think like a geographer, and write like an artist. This means teaching the specific etymology of “photosynthesis” in Science or the structural nuances of an evaluation in Geography.

The How

Professional Development as the Engine

If Disciplinary Literacy is the “what,” then Professional Development is the “how.” The EEF’s Effective Professional Development report moves us away from the “one-off” INSET day and toward a model built on mechanisms.

To move from theory to practice, a school’s Professional Development strategy must include these four categories of mechanisms:

PD Mechanisms — An Example of an Implementation Journey

Using the EEF Implementation Cycle, we can map out how a school might mobilise this evidence:

Explore: Rather than adopting a generic literacy program, the school audits its specific barriers. Are students struggling with the complexity of texts (Language Comprehension) or the technicality of the vocabulary (Disciplinary Literacy)?

Prepare: Identify a “Literacy Taskforce” that includes subject leads. Their role is to identify the “Tier 3” words that act as gatekeepers to their subjects. Perhaps a resource such as the Curriculum Discussion Template could be a useful tool.

Deliver: Professional Development sessions are designed using the mechanisms mentioned above. Teachers don’t just hear about vocabulary instruction; they rehearse explaining a word’s etymology to a colleague before trying it in class.

Sustain: Literacy is not a “theme of the term.” It is embedded into long-term schemes of work and supported by ongoing peer coaching.

Final Reflections

A school’s literacy strategy is only as strong as the professional development that supports it. By moving away from “top-down” mandates and toward a mechanism-heavy, evidence-informed approach, we can ensure that every child, from the streets of Newcastle to the hills of Northumberland, has the tools to write their own future.