Home

Research School Network: Aligned for Impact: Securing Excellence for Disadvantaged Pupils ‘It is not just what you implement but how you do it too’

Blog


Aligned for Impact: Securing Excellence for Disadvantaged Pupils

‘It is not just what you implement but how you do it too’

by St. Matthew's Research School
on the

Tracey 2

Tracey Adams

Tracey Adams is the Head Teacher at a school in inner-city Birmingham, with a high level of disadvantage and a Senior ELE for St Matthew’s Research School.

Read more aboutTracey Adams

Aligned for Impact: Securing Excellence for Disadvantaged Pupils

When I reflect on our improvement journey, one lesson stands out above all others: sustainable change comes from alignment, not activity. Like many schools, we once had several worthwhile priorities that sat alongside one another, rather than working together. Staff were committed, but holding multiple plans in their heads created unnecessary complexity. It prompted an important question: if everything is a priority, is anything really a priority?

At Christ Church C of E Primary School, where 67% of pupils are eligible for Pupil Premium, that reflection changed the way we lead improvement. The Education Endowment Foundation, in A School’s Guide to Implementation Guidance Report, reminds us that It is not just what you implement but how you do it too.’ This message has become central to our thinking.

Guidance Report


A coherent strategy, not competing documents

Our School Improvement Plan, Pupil Premium Strategy and Subject Leader Action Plans now tell one coherent story. Rather than being separate documents, they reinforce one another and what surprised us most was the confidence this created. Staff no longer asked which priority came first because everyone could see how their work contributed to a shared purpose.

Contextual factors

From planning to precision implementation
The School’s Guide to Implementation document encourages schools to treat implementation as a process’. Slowing down to explore before acting felt uncomfortable at first, but asking What problem are we solving?’ prevented us from introducing initiatives that added to our workload without improving outcomes.

One example came from reading. Our first instinct was to purchase another intervention programme. Instead, implementation discussions revealed that classroom practice was already strong but inconsistent. We chose to align professional development around high-quality vocabulary instruction instead of buying something new. That decision strengthened everyday teaching across all subjects and proved to be far more sustainable.

Consistency through clarity

Implementation is fundamentally a collaborative and social process driven by how people think, behave, and interact.’ We learnt that coherence is built through conversations, not documents. Professional development became the bridge between strategy and classroom practice, helping colleagues understand not only what was changing but why.

Monitoring shifted from checking compliance to understanding learning. Governors, leaders and teachers began using the same evidence to ask better questions about impact, rather than activity.

Impact in the Classroom

As the guidance explains, what really matters is how it manifests itself in the day-to-day work of people in schools.’ Pupils never experience our improvement plans — they experience our teaching. Every aligned decision must therefore strengthen classroom practice.

Keeping disadvantaged pupils at the centre means targeted support sits alongside, not separate from, high-quality teaching. Greater consistency has raised expectations and improved outcomes because equity is embedded in everyday practice.

Sustaining Excellence

Perhaps the hardest lesson has been learning to say no. The guidance encourages schools to do fewer things better’ by carefully selecting and embedding evidence-informed approaches that drive meaningful and sustainable change.’ Resisting the temptation to chase every new initiative has given us the space to embed what matters most.

Sustaining Excellence

Looking back, alignment is more than an organisational tool; it is a moral commitment. Every meeting, monitoring activity and professional development session should improve life chances for disadvantaged pupils. When systems align, teachers focus on great teaching rather than competing demands. When teachers thrive, children flourish. For me, that is what meaningful implementation looks like.

References
EEF (2024) A School’s Guide to Implementation Guidance Report. Education Endowment Foundation.

This website collects a number of cookies from its users for improving your overall experience of the site.Read more