Where to start?
Engaging with predictive processing, he argues, begins with understanding the basics: how prediction, priors, and prediction error shape perception and learning. From there, teachers can start reframing practice through this new lens — thinking less about working memory and load, and more about controlling predictability, designing for desirable surprise, and managing the rate of prediction error learners experience. He encourages educators to share their experiences, contribute to emerging discussions, and help shape the developing field. He also hopes research organisations, teacher-training providers, and MAT leaders will begin incorporating predictive processing into CPD and initial teacher education, ensuring that new teachers understand the evolution of cognitive science beyond the traditional models of Baddeley and Hitch.
Looking ahead, Adam is turning his attention to an area he sees as the missing link: the precise neuroscience of how the brain updates its generative model — how learning changes neural wiring so that predictions improve over time. This underpins key educational concepts such as forgetting, spacing and retrieval, and offers promising implications for curriculum sequencing and timetable design. Alongside this work, he is collaborating with Nathan Burns (@Mrmetacogntiion) to develop an explicitly taught, TA-facilitated “Thinking Skills” metacognition programme.
For teachers encountering Predictive Processing for the first time, Adam offers reassurance. Despite the technical language, at its core the theory is beautifully simple: every brain strives to make better predictions. Everything educators do — from routines and modelling to feedback and relationships — supports that predictive process. Once seen through this lens, the classroom becomes a radically different space.
To explore these ideas further, you can visit Adam’s Substack, Predictably Correct, where he continues to unpack topics such as “Move over CLT: Predictive Processing Theory is here.”