Research School Network: Improving Disciplinary Literacy Reflections on improving literacy across the curriculum
Improving Disciplinary Literacy
Reflections on improving literacy across the curriculum
by Sandringham Research School
Sarah Hosegood, Research Lead
The combination of writing next year’s school improvement plan and preparing for a Research School training day on Improving Secondary Literacy (21 June 2022) has enabled me to focus on exploring the significance of disciplinary literacy.
Disciplinary literacy is defined in the EEF Improving Literacy in Secondary Schools Guidance Report as, “an approach to improving literacy across the curriculum. It recognises that literacy skills are both general and subject specific, emphasising the value of supporting teachers of every subject to teach students how to read, write and communicate effectively.”
As a school we are aiming to have a renewed focus on:
- literacy across subject departments
- teachers being better informed about the importance of subject-specific reading
- departments reviewing how reading is built into their provision
- increasing the frequency students read subject specific texts.
However, with these identified objectives, I have realised that we are not starting at the beginning and need to take a few steps back before diving in.
Firstly, we have not given our departments the time to consider what disciplinary literacy looks like in their specific subject areas. The questions from the EEF below are going to be adapted for our use:
- What is unique about your subject discipline in terms of reading, writing, speaking and listening? What is common with other subject disciplines?
- Are there any typical literacy misconceptions held by students, for example, how to write an effective science report?
- Are there words and phrases used typically, or uniquely, in the subject discipline?
Taken from EEF Guidance report ‘Improving Literacy in Secondary Schools’
Secondly, I am concerned that actions related to improving disciplinary literacy are going to be seen as a series of ‘bolt-ons’ which teachers and heads of department plan for but are not integrated into the aims of the curriculum. We need to consider how we are going to use INSET on curriculum development to allow the time and thinking needed for there to be a truly integrated approach, rather than the curriculum and literacy working as two separate strands.
Questions I am considering are:
- Do departments need to consider, and perhaps write, a subject specific statement of intent related to literacy within their subject area, and formalise their aims and objectives?
- How do can we move the work our Whole School Literacy Coordinator focuses on, i.e., the whole school read and the leadership of Accelerated Reader, to support the work within subject departments?
- What CPD do we need for heads of subject to understand the EEF’s implementation cycle and how it can be used for this area of work?
To support the planning, I read ‘Disciplinary Literacy and Explicit Vocabulary Teaching: A whole school approach to closing the attainment gap’ by Katherine Mortimore. The first chapter made me think about the last challenge that I believe we need to resolve as a school, for disciplinary literacy to be improved. Mortimore discusses how disciplinary literacy must be supported by a range of strategies for students to gain their subject specific knowledge base. It was the paragraph below which really resonated with me about how we do this for all students and ensure no child is put at a disadvantage.
“A child with poor literacy skills who uses a blank exercise book interspersed with worksheets is unlikely to find their own work a useful resource to revisit. If we consider a number of literacy issues that surround weaker literacy, we can see how this pattern develops:
- Illegible handwriting
- Lack of motivation
- Incomplete tasks
- Low attendance
- Lack of organisation
- Weaker motor skills
Just one of these traits is likely to result in a resource that, at best, has gaps and, at worst, is a tatty mess that the teacher hides at the bottom of a pile in book scrutiny.”
‘Disciplinary Literacy and Explicit Vocabulary Teaching: A whole school approach to closing the attainment gap’ by Katherine Mortimore
As a school we have used knowledge organisers which can support students like the example above and which include aspects of disciplinary literacy. However, to ensure that all students benefit fully from the work we are about to embark on, we need to consider how best to use knowledge organisers, ensuring that the key knowledge base and disciplinary literacy are not lost.
Overall, the issues we need to develop are complex, especially considering the impact on curriculum design, therefore this area of development is likely to be a long-term project to ensure that the effective implementation of disciplinary literacy sparks a positive change for all students.
Related EventsShow all events
More from the Sandringham Research SchoolShow all news
Why they matter and how to write a good one
10 Ways to Support Reading
Making progress using reading strategies
Using metacognition in secondary science
How we can teach students subject-specific strategies