Research School Network: Intelligent Adaptation John Rodgers (Cornwall Associate Research School) on when and when not to adapt the active ingredients of an intervention
—
Blog
Intelligent Adaptation
John Rodgers (Cornwall Associate Research School) on when and when not to adapt the active ingredients of an intervention
Share on:
by Kingsbridge Research School
on the
In “Adaptation”, an essay from the book “Languages of Truth”, Salman Rushdie describes Darwin’s finches:
“The twelve separate varieties of finches that Charles Darwin found on the Galápagos Islands had all made local adaptations, but when the ornithologist John Gould examined Darin’s specimens in 1837, he could see that these were not different birds but twelve different species of the same bird. In spite of random mutation and natural selection, their finch-ness, their essence, was intact.”
Active ingredients of programmes and practices that we may be implementing could be thought of in a similar way. We must ask of our interventions, “Wherein does their finch-ness lie? Of what does their essence consist?”
In a useful resource from the EEF exploring the implementation theme of active ingredients, one finds a recommendation to “Make thoughtful adaptations only when the active ingredients are securely understood and implemented”.
Much like the different conditions (for example the food sources) on each of the Galápagos Islands drove each species of finch to different local adaptation, there may be scope for local adaptation in school contexts for the flexible elements of a programme or practice. These flexible elements are “features or practices within an intervention that are not directly related to the theory and mechanism of change”.
The “finch-ness” of the intervention must be securely understood, however. The “finch-ness” – the essence of the intervention – is the feature that makes the intervention work, it’s the thing that makes the finch a finch. Once the essence of each active ingredient is securely understood, characterised and implemented, local adaptations might be introduced. Schools may find value in professional flexibility and autonomy, and intelligent adaptation could encourage staff buy-in and ownership. It may enhance the fit between the intervention and the local conditions. The most likely beneficial adaptations are novel additions rather than modifications. These enhance rather than change the essence, the finch-ness of the intervention.
Key points:
- Active ingredients are the essence (“finch-ness”) of an intervention – they are the elements that make it work
- Make thoughtful adaptations only when the active ingredients are securely understood and implemented
- Once the essence of each active ingredient is securely understood, characterised and implemented, local adaptations might be introduced
- Intelligent adaptation could encourage staff buy-in and ownership
- The most likely beneficial adaptations are novel additions rather than modifications
Related Events
Show all eventsMore from the Kingsbridge Research School
Show all newsBlog -
Why it’s important to engage people in planning
How the ‘engage’ concept from the implementation guidance might inform your approach to planning
Blog -
Next Temporary Better: School Leadership in a Complex System
Viewing school leadership through the lens of complex adaptive systems
Blog -
Whatever happened to the Gathering and Interpreting Data tool?
Jon Eaton, director of Kingsbridge Research School, discusses some of the changes in the new Explore phase