Making the Difference for Disadvantaged Pupils
An EEF programme facilitated by Kingsbridge Research School and SWIFT Teaching School Hub

Share on:
by Devon Research School
on the
Defining the problem or challenge that you are trying to address is an important first step in the implementation process. It helps to ensure that you are focusing your efforts on the right issue and can help to guide the selection of an evidence-based practice or intervention.
Here are some tips for defining the problem precisely:
By gathering data to define the problem precisely, educators can ensure that they are focusing their efforts on the right issue and are better equipped to select an evidence-based practice or intervention that is likely to address the problem effectively.
To diagnose a patient’s disease, a doctor will first examine the symptoms. These may be clear and lead the clinician to the cause. In other circumstances, symptoms may overlap and the need for further evidence will arise. Blood will be taken, tests will be commissioned, results examined in the search for the underlying cause of the illness. Certain doctors may consider contributing factors: lifestyle, age, family history.
Diagnosis must be of the underlying cause, for only then will the correct treatment be prescribed.
Diagnosing the needs of our pupils may well follow a similar pattern. We often start with a hunch based on the observable symptoms. Our initial knowledge and beliefs should be tested by gathering and interpreting rigorous and relevant data. If we can make plausible and credible interpretations of data drawn from a range of sources, we may well be nearing diagnosis, confident that the identified need is a priority for our students.
Marc Rowland writes, “Link exploration of evidence to issues arising from a rigorous assessment of needs. Evidence should inform how schools respond to pupil need in the classroom and in wider school life. A research informed approach, without a rigorous assessment of need, may take schools in the wrong direction.”
As we use evidence to hone and clarify our diagnosis, we should do the same with evidence for strategies, interventions or approaches that address the defined problem. We must ask questions of the evidence, being critical consumers of it. What works? What works, for whom, and in what context? How does it work? What are the ‘active ingredients’?
It is as though the two sides of evidence, the diagnosis and the approach (treatment) are in conversation with one another. The more they talk, the better the fit that will be achieved.
The ultimate goal is for precise diagnosis of need for our students, and the identification of an evidence-informed ‘best bet’ that is contextually appropriate.
Blog -
How exam wrappers can be a valuable source of student feedback and reflection
Blog -
Sandra Westlake explains how she’s using mock papers to unpack metacognitive thinking in maths
Blog -
Kingsbridge Research School is rebranding to become Devon Research School
This website collects a number of cookies from its users for improving your overall experience of the site.Read more