Secondary Case study: student leadership of extracurricular clubs
Utilising sixth formers to boost the extracurricular offer
Share on:
by Huntington Research School
on the
Cambridge Assessment released their ‘Aspects of Writing’ study on Wednesday to much interest. The full title of the research is the less tabloid-friendly ‘Variations in aspects of writing in 16+ English Examinations between 1980 to 2014’. Still, the headlines came thick and fast. The Daily Mail gave us:‘Sign off the times: GCSE pupils make more spelling mistakes than their parents’ generation and often cannot spell ‘too’, ‘of’ and ‘said’. Whereas The Times furnished us with: ‘Oh my word: GCSE pupils can’t spell ‘off’’.
Answers to the problem quickly raced to blaming the government for failed initiatives in “drilling punctuation” to blaming Facebook and other forms of social media. The truth behind the research is – typically – much more subtle than the grand-standing headlines, but no less interesting.
First, it is important to apply the caution that Cambridge Assessment assigns to their study: it is a “finger in the wind! Indication of 16 year old’s writing.” The grand decline in spelling and writing standards is not so marked. Yes, errors are more frequent in the most recent writing sample (it is important to note it was the iGCSE examination – a high stakes assessment under pressured timed conditions) from 2014, when compared to 1980, but many of the changes are not as marked as suggested in the headlines.
The crucial finding about the suggested decline in spelling, as reported by the media, was that spelling errors increased only with students with grades below a D grade – and not all students. It is unsurprising to me, as a long-standing English teacher, that E grade and F grade students are making few inroads into spelling during exam conditions.
Other interesting writing patterns emerge from the research:
So what can we take away from this evidence? First, I would say that the dizzying merry-go-round of government writing initiatives, charted by the researchers, really does little to change the fundamental writing patterns of our teens. Policy makers should consider more sustainable curriculum change in schools, with concurrent training for teachers, to improve upon the subtle nuances of writing that emerge from such studies.
Also, we should reflect on changes in technology etc., but avoid quick blame for the ‘Facebook effect’ on all of our writing ills, as the evidence is slim in this regard. Despite the shoddy standard of writing on Facebook and more, there isn’t much evidence to show that ‘text-speak’ was rife, nor that students were unable to understand how to shift the formality and style of their writing across different contexts.
What can teachers take away from the study? Here are some prompts:
Alex Quigley, English teacher, author of ‘The Confident Teacher, and Director of Huntington Research School, York
Utilising sixth formers to boost the extracurricular offer
Fostering Belonging and Growth through a coherent extracurricular offer
How can we refine existing literacy approaches?
This website collects a number of cookies from its users for improving your overall experience of the site.Read more