During a recent school visit, I saw a lesson building a description using suspense. The modelled line:
The sky was black.
The teacher stopped, “I want my reader to feel the tension here. I’m thinking of how the sky quickly changed to a type of sky which suggests something scary is coming”. The modelled writing being revealed on the board had the pupils already imagining.
The sky collapsed into darkness. I could tell something was coming.
The teacher paused again, offered opportunities to choral read, whilst exaggerating ‘collapsed’. “I need to bring in the other senses to build further tension. Maybe I’ll add a sound with a conjunction and then zoom into a short sentence with an impactful reaction.” Again, the pupils could see the thoughts of an author come to life on the board, not by magic but through a careful decisions, reflection and experimentation.
The sky collapsed into darkness and a growl of thunder crawled across the horizon. She froze.
That short conversation that the teacher had with herself taught the pupils more about crafting suspense than any checklist ever could.
So, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty: what made this a powerful exercise?
1. They made thinking ‘visible’
Research from Fisher & Frey (2014) emphasises that visible learning — where teachers make their thinking transparent — is key to helping students transfer skills and strategies to independent work. Children need to see that good writing is not magic — it’s thoughtful. Verbalising your thought process shows them that writing is built through purposeful, conscious choices.
2. They built writer identity – ‘we are writers!’
When children hear a teacher thinking critically about their own writing, they begin to see themselves as capable of doing the same. It fosters ownership and confidence: “Writers think like this, and I can too.”
3. They deepened understanding of syntax and grammar
Metacognitive strategies help children internalise the language of writing. They begin to notice sentence structure, tone, audience and purpose — not just imitate sentence patterns, or my favourite: substitute ‘Alice’ for ‘Andrea’!
4. They encouraged revising.
Graves (1983) championed the idea that writing is a process, not a product, and that learners need to experience the full cycle – including rethinking and redrafting- to develop authentic writing skills. The EEF’s Guidance Report: ‘Improving Literacy in KS2’ demonstrates the importance of revising in recommendation 4. By modelling the messy, iterative nature of writing – complete with false starts and rethinking – teachers show that revising writing is not a failure, but a natural part of the writing process.