I gave students the etymology of the word, which led one student to question, ‘So, have we stolen most of our prefixes from France?’ referring to the ‘re’ part, which suggests an idea of returning or responding. He linked this to other words like ‘respect’, ‘rescue’, and ‘result’, understanding they imply a reciprocal relationship.
This indicated he recognised this from previous explicit vocabulary teaching, creating links across different contexts. I defined ‘responsibility’ as ‘to have care and accountability for a person or thing.’ Realising ‘accountability’ might confuse students, I focused on ‘care.’ One student commented, ‘my mum calls me responsible’ because she babysits, showing she ‘cares’ for the children, making her responsible.
Before applying ‘responsibility’ to ‘I Am Malala,’ students completed a low-stakes whiteboard activity, applying ‘responsibility’ to two teachers they know. All students successfully completed this.”
This model of explicitly teaching vocabulary can be used for any group, regardless of ability. Maddie’s methods are also supported by the EEF’s Recommendation 2 from ‘Improving Literacy in Secondary Schools’, specifically with regards to how it is vital that all teachers must ‘provide targeted vocabulary instruction’ through ‘effective approaches’ to ‘make connections between words’; at DVA, we have found it effective for helping students recognise and connect root words, suffixes, and prefixes, and develop confidence in using complex or new words accurately in context, e.g., ‘Malala’s life has become very treacherous because the Taliban threaten Mingora.’